Skip to content
A computer screen displays a web-based dashboard with a technical browser table, showing columns for instance name, participant, region, version, OS, and dates.
  • Feasibility Studies

Feasibility Studies: Assess supplier readiness before award and launch

Assess supplier manufacturability and delivery readiness through structured technical, quality, and logistics reviews. Collaborate with suppliers, track open actions, and support informed sourcing decisions.

What are SupplyOn Feasibility Studies?

Feasibility studies are structured technical assessments used to evaluate whether a supplier can manufacture and deliver a part under specified conditions.

SupplyOn supports these assessments with structured supplier input, technical reviews, and action tracking. The results help manufacturers identify potential risks and inform sourcing and project decisions.

The Challenge

A supplier quote is not proof of manufacturing and delivery feasibility

Before awarding business, manufacturers need to understand whether suppliers can meet technical, quality, and logistics requirements. Yet fragmented review processes can make it difficult to obtain reliable information, resolve open questions, and use feasibility findings in sourcing decisions.

Uncertain supplier feasibility

Without a systematic assessment of manufacturability, quality, and logistics requirements, potential supplier limitations may remain unclear until later project stages.

Fragmented reviews and supplier collaboration

Spreadsheets, email exchanges, and disconnected feedback make it difficult to consolidate supplier responses, coordinate responsibilities, and follow up on open technical questions.

Feasibility results disconnected from decisions

When review findings and outstanding actions are not connected to sourcing and project workflows, teams have less consistent information for supplier selection and project handover.

The Solution

Transform feasibility studies into a structured supplier readiness workflow

SupplyOn brings supplier input, technical reviews, action tracking, and feasibility results into a connected process. Sourcing, quality, and project teams can work with structured information to assess supplier readiness before nomination and launch.

Feasibility studies for different technical review scenarios

Conduct mechanical, electronic, logistics, and risk-based feasibility reviews using configurable questionnaires and flexible review structures tailored to specific part requirements.

Business impacts:
  • Better Review Alignment: Match assessments to specific technical and supplier requirements.
  • More Relevant Technical Input: Gather information relevant to technical decisions.
  • Earlier Risk Detection: Identify potential manufacturability and logistics risks.
A person sits at a desk working on a computer displaying a database or spreadsheet in a modern office environment.
Person sits at a desk in a modern office, looking at a large computer monitor displaying a website with survey or questionnaire forms.

Collaborative questionnaires and controlled supplier responses

Collect structured supplier responses and manage attachments, comments, and open actions in a shared review process with clear response and review status.

Business impacts
  • Less Manual Consolidation: Reduce effort spent collecting supplier feedback.
  • Better Data Quality: Collect more complete and consistent supplier responses.
  • Faster Technical Clarification: Coordinate open questions more efficiently.

Integrated decision flow from sourcing to project execution

Initiate feasibility reviews from sourcing, track their status within sourcing workflows, and connect results with project management and APQP processes.

Business impacts
  • Better Supplier Selection: Use feasibility findings to inform sourcing decisions.
  • Smoother Project Transitions: Carry review information into subsequent project phases.
  • Less Duplicate Work: Reduce repeated information gathering across workflows.
Office workers in a modern workspace look at computer monitors displaying data while others work in the background; the setting appears professional and collaborative.

“Right from the start, SupplyOn's Service Technical Review has been a great asset in evaluating the manufacturability of our products. Involving our suppliers in the discussion at an early stage leads to an open, solution-oriented exchange that prevents unpleasant surprises later on. A major strength of the tool is the centralized and transparent documentation of the complete review process. With the support of this valuable service, we can run comparable and reliable manufacturability analyses with our suppliers during the supplier selection process, thereby determining the reliability of the selected supplier. This gives us a high degree of planning security and prevents costly changes in later phases.“

Christian Ribeiro AUMOVIO

Improve the efficiency of supplier feasibility reviews

Structured feasibility assessments can create value across procurement, quality management, and project execution. By reducing administrative work, standardizing supplier evaluations, and making potential risks visible earlier, manufacturers can strengthen the efficiency and consistency of their sourcing processes.

Reduced Feasibility Review Effort

Spend less time consolidating supplier responses and following up on technical questions.

More consistent supplier evaluations

Use structured questionnaires to assess suppliers, parts, and projects consistently.

Stronger pre-award and launch decisions

Use feasibility findings and open actions to support supplier selection and project preparation.

Less spreadsheet chasing. Better technical clarity. Stronger supplier readiness before nomination and launch.

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

A feasibility study assesses whether a supplier can manufacture and deliver a specific part or product under defined technical, quality, and logistics conditions. It focuses on the requirements and potential risks of a particular sourcing or project situation.

A supplier audit typically examines broader aspects of a supplier’s management systems, processes, or operational capabilities. Both assessments can contribute to supplier evaluation, but they serve different purposes.

SupplyOn supports mechanical technical reviews, electronic technical reviews, SCM logistics technical reviews, and risk-based technical reviews.

Manufacturers can use configurable questionnaires to address requirements relevant to the part and sourcing situation. This allows teams to evaluate different technical and operational feasibility dimensions rather than relying on a single generic assessment.

Feasibility studies are particularly valuable during supplier shortlisting, technical supplier evaluation, and before supplier award.

They can also support the transition from sourcing into project execution, including APQP-related activities. Conducting reviews early gives manufacturers more opportunity to clarify technical requirements, assess potential constraints, and address open questions before production launch.

SupplyOn provides a shared environment for managing technical reviews instead of relying on disconnected spreadsheets and email exchanges.

Structured questionnaires, supplier responses, attachments, comments, due dates, action tracking, and review status help teams coordinate assessments and maintain a clearer record of findings and open issues. This reduces manual consolidation and makes the review process easier to follow.

The information depends on the configured review type and the requirements of the part or project.

Feasibility assessments can cover manufacturability, electronic and technical requirements, logistics capabilities, delivery volumes, and project milestones. Suppliers and internal teams can also provide supporting documents, comments, and clarifications, while open actions and review status help track the assessment process.

Get started

Strengthen supplier readiness before sourcing decisions

See how SupplyOn can help you evaluate supplier feasibility, coordinate technical reviews, and connect findings with sourcing and project activities.